K. Coppejans
To Win
D. Stricker
To Win
Kimmer Coppejans vs Daniel Michalski Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L W W L W L W W
Form
L W W W L W W W W LHead To Head: Coppejans 1 - 0 Michalski
They have played 3 sets in total, with Coppejans winning 2 and Michalski winning 1. The last match between Coppejans and Michalski was at the Oeiras 3 Challenger, 24-06-2022, Quarterfinals, Clay with Kimmer Coppejans getting the victory 5-7 7-6(2) 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Kimmer Coppejans | 1 |
| Daniel Michalski | 0 |
Oeiras 3 Challenger(24-06-2022)
5
7
7
6
6
3
Upcoming Match
22 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Fett VS Ruzic PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
22 Apr 2025 / Q3
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Kudermetova VS Kudermetova PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
22 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5-7 7-6(2) 6-3 |
Stats 
Kimmer Coppejans
Player
Daniel Michalski
68%
(
65 of
95)
1st Serve %
61%
(
72 of
118)
6
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
71%
(
46 of
65)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
40 of
72)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
33%
(
31 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
48 of
118)
112
Total Points Won
101
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 18 | Games Won | 16 |
| 6 | Aces (Total) | 4 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 2:59:35 | Average Match Time | 2:59:35 |
| 68% (65/95) | 1st Serve % | 61% (72/118) |
| 71% (46/65) | 1st Serve Win % | 56% (40/72) |
| 60% (18/30) | 2nd Serve Win % | 65% (30/46) |
| 33% (4/12) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 75% (3/4) |
| 41% (48/118) | Return Points Win % | 33% (31/95) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Kimmer Coppejans Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Kimmer Coppejans
Player
Norbert Gombos
58%
(
42 of
73)
1st Serve %
52%
(
42 of
81)
6
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
3
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
32 of
42)
68%
(
21 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
21 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
31 of
81)
83
Total Points Won
71
|
3-6 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kimmer Coppejans
Player
Tiago Pereira
60%
(
42 of
70)
1st Serve %
60%
(
56 of
94)
4
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
2
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
36 of
56)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
14 of
38)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
40%
(
28 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
44 of
94)
86
Total Points Won
78
|
1-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
Player
Kimmer Coppejans
67%
(
67 of
100)
1st Serve %
60%
(
53 of
88)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
51%
(
34 of
67)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
37 of
53)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
47%
(
47 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
28 of
88)
81
Total Points Won
107
|
7-6(5) 0-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kimmer Coppejans
Player
Radu Albot
55%
(
35 of
64)
1st Serve %
56%
(
45 of
80)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
72%
(
21 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
21 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
36 of
80)
79
Total Points Won
65
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Rincon
Player
Kimmer Coppejans
56%
(
67 of
120)
1st Serve %
57%
(
58 of
101)
6
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
72%
(
48 of
67)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
37 of
58)
53%
(
28 of
53)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
37%
(
44 of
120)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
40 of
101)
116
Total Points Won
105
|
6-7(3) 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kimmer Coppejans
Player
Ryan Nijboer
51%
(
30 of
59)
1st Serve %
56%
(
36 of
64)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
63%
(
19 of
30)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
39%
(
23 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
35 of
64)
71
Total Points Won
52
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kimmer Coppejans
Player
Izan Corretja
56%
(
18 of
32)
1st Serve %
44%
(
16 of
36)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
9
89%
(
16 of
18)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
4 of
20)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
7 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
51
Total Points Won
17
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Carlos Taberner
Player
Kimmer Coppejans
70%
(
69 of
99)
1st Serve %
66%
(
67 of
101)
1
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
61%
(
42 of
69)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
43 of
67)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
40%
(
40 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
41 of
101)
100
Total Points Won
100
|
2-6 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kimmer Coppejans
Player
Pablo Llamas Ruiz
51%
(
29 of
57)
1st Serve %
67%
(
45 of
67)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
19 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
67)
68
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kimmer Coppejans
Player
Elmer Moller
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve %
68%
(
47 of
69)
6
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
5
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
37%
(
19 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
69)
68
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Daniel Michalski Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F |
Stats
Luka Mikrut
Player
Daniel Michalski
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve %
54%
(
32 of
59)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
88%
(
29 of
33)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
15 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
59)
67
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Daniel Michalski
Player
Moise Kouame
58%
(
54 of
93)
1st Serve %
57%
(
54 of
95)
2
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
1
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
32 of
54)
46%
(
18 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
17 of
41)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
44%
(
41 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
46 of
95)
98
Total Points Won
90
|
7-6(3) 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Michalski
Player
Alexey Vatutin
67%
(
68 of
102)
1st Serve %
84%
(
88 of
105)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
60%
(
41 of
68)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
43 of
88)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
60%
(
9 of
15)
Break Points Won
75%
(
6 of
8)
41%
(
42 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
53 of
105)
113
Total Points Won
94
|
6-7(6) 6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Michalski
Player
Evgenii Tiurnev
47%
(
20 of
43)
1st Serve %
60%
(
36 of
60)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
70%
(
14 of
20)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
83%
(
19 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
23%
(
10 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
34 of
60)
67
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Michalski
Player
Jakub Nicod
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve %
58%
(
19 of
33)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
65%
(
17 of
26)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
12 of
19)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
8 of
14)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
38%
(
15 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
37
Total Points Won
35
|
5-4 ret. | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Oleksii Krutykh
Player
Daniel Michalski
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve %
73%
(
37 of
51)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
15 of
37)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
14 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
61
Total Points Won
35
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Michalski
Player
Stijn Slump
76%
(
41 of
54)
1st Serve %
54%
(
32 of
59)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
37%
(
20 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
63
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Michalski
Player
Eero Vasa
67%
(
63 of
94)
1st Serve %
68%
(
91 of
134)
0
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
5
62%
(
39 of
63)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
55 of
91)
68%
(
21 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
19 of
43)
29%
(
5 of
17)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
36%
(
34 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
60 of
134)
120
Total Points Won
108
|
7-6(5) 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Michalski
Player
Bekkhan Atlangeriev
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve %
65%
(
32 of
49)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
16 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
58
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Zdenek Kolar
Player
Daniel Michalski
58%
(
59 of
101)
1st Serve %
68%
(
67 of
98)
1
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
1
71%
(
42 of
59)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
40 of
67)
43%
(
18 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
41%
(
41 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
42 of
98)
102
Total Points Won
97
|
6-3 6-7(1) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 59% (467/329) | Win/Loss | 63% (261/152) |
| 56% (1061/837) | Sets Win/Loss | 61% (575/372) |
| 53% (9354/8415) | Games Win/Loss | 54% (4668/3937) |
| 62% (140/87) | Hard Win/Loss | 48% (30/32) |
| 61% (307/197) | Clay Win/Loss | 66% (226/114) |
| 32% (17/36) | Indoor Hard W/L | 45% (5/6) |
| 25% (3/9) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.25 | Aces Per Game | 0.14 |
| 2136 | Aces Total | 575 |
| 0.21 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.2 |
| 1794 | Total Double Faults | 833 |
| 1:28:43 | Average Match Time | 1:49:27 |
| 494.1 | Average Opponent Rank | 500.76 |
| 65% (31203/48346) | 1st Serve % | 62% (16739/27165) |
| 67% (20948/31203) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (10792/16739) |
| 49% (8332/17143) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (5356/10426) |
| 43% (2347/5397) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (1581/3324) |
| 42% (20743/49504) | Return Points Win % | 44% (12233/27516) |
| 52% (34/31) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 33% (3/6) | Cups W/L | 50% (1/1) |
| 28% (11/29) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/4) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 57% (292/219) | Challenger W/L | 50% (68/69) |
| 75% (127/43) | Futures W/L | 71% (192/78) |
| 59% (461/783) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 63% (257/406) |
| 40% (4/10) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 55% (117/212) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 66% (56/85) |
| 57% (169/296) | Deciding Set Win % | 55% (71/128) |
| 84% (433/363) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (257/223) |
| 16% (433/69) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (257/33) |
| 28% (363/103) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 24% (156/37) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
